TOEFL対策コラム

5分でわかる!Integrated   =  読みやすいエッセイ =


| TOEFL ライティング Integrated   = 読みやすいエッセイ =

Integrated ライティングでは、パッセージの内容に対し、レクチャーでの反論点を把握し、

それらを関連付けてエッセイを書くことが求められます。


さらに評価を上げるには、読みやすさ ”展開を予想しながら読めること” です。

正しい情報を詰め込んでも、それが読み手の頭に入りやすい順序で

書かれていなければ、「読みにくいエッセイ」と思われてしまい、

評価が下がってしまいます。


「読みやすいエッセイ」の秘訣は、「Introductionの中で、Reading passageの論点を

書いたしたうえでレクチャーの立場を明確にすること」と、「BodyでLectureの論点を論じる

ことです。


設計図としては、以下のようになります。

それでは実際に、解答例でエッセイの構成を確認します。

| Introduction

The topic discussed here is the investiga­tion of the causes of the disappearance of the sea otter, which is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. The woman in the lecture argues that the cause of their disappearance is the presence of the predators, especially areas, and not pollution as the reading says.

| Body 1   パッセージ理由1への反論

Firstly, she argues that one of the proofs of their being attacked by the predators is the fact that no one can find any dead sea otters. If the cause was the pollution, many dead sea otters would be found along the shores. In addition, a predator will immediately eat its prey so this is why no dead sea otters were found.

|  Body 2   パッセージ理由2への反論 Body

Secondly, the woman in the lecture argues there is another explanation than pollution why smaller sea mammals are all disappearing.She says that, since the whales tend to disap­pear because of the humans hunting them, the areas had to adapt their food habits to the sea conditions and as a result they have started eating the smaller sea animals available among them sea otters being included.

|  Body 3   パッセージ理由3への反論 Body

Thirdly, she argues that the areas can­not access the shallow locations. This is why there are some areas where the sea otters are numerous. It’s not because of uneven concen­trations of pollutants. 

| Conclusion   省略